lass=”proflinkPrefix”>+Viktor Markowski's post:
Now … to bring together folk who resonate to this thinking in order to actualize a system; this is my challenge.
The problem? Far easier to talk about swamp drainage than to wade in and deal with muck and slime and alligators! 
Individuals realize social benefit (such as acclaim, rewards, salary) from talking about problems. This acts as a dis-incentive to actual innovation i.e. doing is always harder than talking about doing. Thus has it always been!
Reshared post from +Bernard ben Tremblay
"How might we develop criteria for a design capable of supporting a large range of collective intelligence phenomena in an integrated way? Will the emergent socio-economic life forms be strong enough to balance the destructive power of our global crises if and when "the perfect storm" hits? When everything goes worse and worse, and better and better, at the same time, and they do it faster and faster, how do we deal with the ensuing chaos? In order to bring forth desirable futures, we must be ready to navigate through it, using a twin path of collective intelligence and collective leadership. This is our global challenge. This paper [PDF; 450KB] is the first in that will delve into the topic more deeply, expanding certain sections of this overall expose into separate albeit inter-related lines of inquiry."
h/t +Viktor Markowski
Embedded Link
Collective Intelligence and Collective Leadership: Twin Paths to Beyond Chaos. – Sprouts
Abstract By looking at collective intelligence (CI) through four distinct lenses, this paper draws on recent research in organizational design, evolutionary economics, cognitive sciences, knowledge ec…
Google+: View post on Google+
Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.
